mercredi 26 juin 2013

grindhouse classics “massacre mafia style” (a.k.a. “the executioner”)

Wow. That’s the first word that comes to mind when discussing quasi-legendary nightclub singer/comedian/all-around entertainer Duke Mitchell’s 1978 no-budget “Godfather” rip-off, “Massacre Mafia Style,” also released both theatrically and on VHS under the alternate titles “The Executioner” and “Like Father, Like Son.” And while it’s tempting to just leave the review at that and let you discover the perverse mayhem of this nearly-forgotten Z-grade masterpiece on your own, I’ve truthfully never been that good at shutting up, so at least a few words are in order—

Mitchell, who also wrote, directed, and produced this 79-minute homage to pure cinematic chaos on a frayed-shoestring budget, stars as Mimi (more often pronounced as M’mi, rather than Me-Me, but it depends on who’s doing the talking), the son of a highly-regarded mafia figure who left America for Sicily at the age of 16 when his father was deported.

Now (whenever that “now” may be) a widower? (he lost his Sicilian wife to incurable cancer) with a 6-year-old son, Mimi asks and receives his elderly dad’s permission to return, alone, to the US in order to take over the LA-area prostitution and numbers-running operations and earn a better future for his son.

A basic enough premise, to be sure, but once Mimi hooks up with childhood friend Jolly (Vic Caeasr) in order to help him with his conquest of the underworld, it’s sheer, frenzied, balls-to-the-walls anarchy from start to finish. Even the slow, “talky” scenes take on an aura of unpredictable WTF-ness thanks to Mitchell’s frenetic, amazingly singular performance. He’s capable of anything at any time, and the viewer quite literally doesn’t know what the hell could happen from one second to the next, as director Mitchell bobs and weaves between straight-forward conventionality and completely-out-of-the-blue experimentalism (the scene where a black pimp is crucified has to be seen to be believed), and actor Mitchell goes from mild-mannered soliloquy-deliverer to insane mafia hitman without a conscience at less than the drop of a hat. You’ve never seen a performance like Mitchell delivers here, and his manic instability and complete incongruousness from one moment to the next is the glue that holds the film together even though, by all respects, he’s quite literally tearing things apart. I can’t explain it, the guy is just a force of (warped, admittedly) nature.

Mimi’s hardscrabble climb to the top is a long, slow slog in terms of time elapsed in the script, but it’s covered at a breakneck pace. Over a decade goes by in Mimi’s life, but as mentioned earlier, the total running time of the film is 79 minutes. In other words, things don’t let up much.

Like most grindhouse fans, my only exposure to “Massacre Mafia Style” came from the trailer included on most Grindhouse Releasing discs from the late 90s onward. Come to find out, in the best low-budget fashion, the trailer is essentially nothing more the film’s opening scene, cut off at a brilliantly tense point — Mimi and Jolly wipe out what appears to be more or less everyone in an entire office building in brutal fashion, and on their way out, a young boy gets into the elevator and we see Mimi patting his head. The entire scene has no dialogue and is overlaid with a faux-”authentic” Dean Martin-style Italian musical number. Now knowing what’s being said, we’re left to wonder — does Mimi kill the kid in order to ensure that there are no living witnesses who might finger he and his partner for the crime?

I won’t give it away, but suffice to say, “Massacre Mafia Style” is a movie that certainly FEELS, from the outset,? like the kid could be shot, regardless of whether or not Mimi actually DOES it.

Now, though, I can proudly say I’ve seen the whole thing, and a whole lot more. That’s because Mitchell’s son, Jeffrey, has released a seriously limited edition (as in 500 copies) three-disc “Family Edition” of his old man’s masterpiece. I don’t know if Grindhouse Releasing will ever get around to putting out their own version (along with Mitchell’s other film they apparently have some sort of claim on, the truly bizarre looking “Gone With The Pope”), but at this point I have to say I don’t really care, because this package gives you so much more than you could ever ask for.

Disc One contains the feature film itself, and while the transfer is quite obviously direct-from-VHS (and presented in mono),? it still looks and sounds decent enough. Added to that, though, we get no less than three feature-length commentary tracks from Jeffrey Mitchell and family friends Frankie Ray (frequent writing collaborator with Duke and, believe it or not, Lenny Bruce) and George Jacobs (long-time personal assistant to and valet for Frank Sinatra). While actual discussion of the film itself on these tracks is a bit spotty, they spin one entertaining yarn after another about the elder Mitchell’s life and career, and obviously know more than just a bit about the intersected worlds of Hollywood and the mob that the story takes its inspiration from.

Rounding out the disc, we have the aforementioned theatrical trailer, some rare radio spots narrated by Duke, and ax extended?preview for another upcoming Jeffrey Mitchell private-issue DVD release, this?of? one of his father’s nightclub acts titled “An Impressionistic Tribute To Jimmy Durante.”

And folks, that’s just the first disc.

On Disc Two, we get a brand new documentary feature on the lives and careers of both Mitchells entitled “Like Father, Like Son,” extended interviews with both Frankie Ray and George Jacobs, audio recordings of one of Duke Mitchell’s final live performances,? a seriously extensive gallery of stills covering not only “Massacre Mafia Style,” but Duke’s entire life and career, and various stages of the film’s script — early treatments, a rough draft, and the final shooting script — available in PDF format.

Finally, a third “bonus disc” is being offered to online customers? that features 30 more minutes of archival footage, interview outtakes with (Jeffrey) Mitchell,? Ray and Jacobs, and additional commentary from all three.

So — yeah. This is one comprehensive package, to say the least, and a true labor of love, all?boxed up?together with a nice inlay card that features “The Executioner” poster from the top of this review on front with a copy of Duke’s scrawled “Italian cheat sheet” on the back. And while it’s not my style to pimp this openly for a product, the only way you’re going to see this thing, unless you’re a friend who wants to come over to my place to watch it, is to order it directly from http://www. massacremafiastyle.com. Like I mentioned earlier, only 500 copies were made, so if you want it, get it while you can.

I’m not really sure what other movie I can compare this to. In a way, it reminds me of a mirror image of? “The Black Connection” (which wouldn’t be a bad choice for my next review, actually) given that they’re both ultra-low-budget late-70s gangster flicks that depict? an underworld war between Italians and African-Americans (albeit from opposite sides), and they’re both equally discombobulated, but “Massacre Mafia Style” is a whole lot bloodier, nastier, funnier (yes, you read that right), and has a LOT more music (again, yes, you read that right).? And there has NEVER been a performance like the one Duke Mitchell delivers in this film, before or since.

I’d give it my highest possible recommendation, but even that seems praise to faint. In short, get off your ass and see it now.

jeudi 13 juin 2013

AOpen vK8T800a-LF Value Board

For those who prefer good price/performance ratio and AMD Athlon 64-bitprocessors, AOpen will introduce a motherboard mid May just for that purpose --the vK8T800a-LF. The new motherboard is designed to be installed with CPUs whichare built with 754 pins such as Athlon 64-bit or Sempron processors. “Thisarchitecture makes the model very competitive,” says Edward Chen, channelmanager of the Platform Development Division. “DIY enthusiasts, students, orusers who look for low cost solutions would love to have such a system,” Chenelaborates.

Despite its competitive pricing, the motherboard is still designed with goodfeatures. For example, the motherboard’s built-in Cool’n’Quiet functionalitysupports three DIMMs while similar systems on the market only support one DIMMmemory module. Three double data rate (DDR) memory modules of 400/333 MHz can beinstalled to the memory slots of the system. The system’s memory can be expandedto 3GB which is more than enough for ordinary users. One of the other strongfeatures of the product is its support to high definition 7.1-channel surroundaudio output port. While the system comes with all standard personal computingfunctions, it can be used as a home entertainment system which can play highdefinition digital music.

Because the motherboard uses VIA K8T800 and VT8237 chips, the system requiresno cooling fan. The motherboard is designed with one AGP 8X slot and four PCIslots. It provides two Serial ATA slots and four IDE slots for installation ofhard drives. The Serial ATA interface supports RAID 0 and RAID 1 hard driveconfiguration. In addition to the 7.1-channel surround sound port, the rearpanel provides four USB connectors, one RJ45 LAN connector, one COM port, oneprinter port, and two PS/2 connectors. The other four USB 2.0 connectors arebuilt on-board and connected to two USB headers. Two 1394 connectors are alsobuilt on-board.

The motherboard is built with an S/P DIF Output header. The output ofSony/Philips digital audio interface circuitry (S/P DIF OUT) can be connected toa digital audio amplifier to generate 7.1 surround sound and Dolby Digital audioeffects which turns your home into an entertainment center. The motherboard hasa size (form factor) of 305 mm by 220 mm.



samedi 8 juin 2013

ASUS N81Vg

ASUS has announcedtheir latest N81Vg which claims to be the world’s first notebook to feature the new NVIDIA GeForce™ GT 120M graphics processing unit (GPU).

Designed to provides powerful multimedia options, the notebook combinesmobility with stunning graphics performance for users. The NVIDIA GeForce™ GT 120M GPU featuresCUDA™ technology with 32 processor cores, DirectX 10 support, and 1080p High Definition video playback through NVIDIA® PureVideo® HD technology.

The ASUS N81Vg delivers up to 15 times better performance than most 14-inch notebook PCs and boasts up to3 hours of battery lifein Performance mode and 4 hours in Battery Conservation mode.

Processor & Cache Memory

Intel® Core™ 2 Duo Processor T9400/P8600/P8400/P7350/T6600/T6400/T5900/T5800

Operating System

Genuine Windows Vista® Ultimate (other editions also available)

Chipset

Mobile Intel® PM45 Express Chipset

Main Memory

DDR2 800MHz up to 4096MB, 2x SO-DIMM

Graphics

NVIDIA® GeForce™ GT 120M

Display

14.0" (Glare Type, LED backlit)

Hard Drive

SATA 160GB / 250GB / 320GB/ 500GB

Optical Drive

DVD Super Multi
Blu-ray DVD Combo

* Video Camera (optional)

Built-in 1.3 M Pixel camera

Dimensions and Weight

342mm x 256mm x 36mm, 2.5kg (with 6-cell battery)

Source: ASUS



dimanche 2 juin 2013

the sound of hollywood patting itself on the back even harder

It’s painfully obvious to one and all that Hollywood has a tremendously high opinion of itself. I admit that watching the Academy Awards is a guilty pleasure for yours truly each and every year, plus two of my favorite people in the world host an Oscar party that has become a tradition that I wouldn’t dream of missing.? But let’s be honest— it’s one of the most self-congratulatory events a person could watch, it’s as decadent as it is pretentious, and most of the self-adulation Hollywood heaps on itself during the ceremony is entirely undeserved.

Plus there’s the small problem that most of the films nominated for best picture suck, and when there’s a good one nominated it seldom wins. For evidence of this, look no further than last year’s awards, where “Slumdog Millionaire,” an entirely unexceptional film that was little more than a mass-market, anglicized cash-in on Bollywood? (a Bollywood movie for people who have never seen a Bollywood movie, more or less) beat out a piece of genuinely challenging filmmaking “The Reader” and one of the best political biopics you’ll ever see in “Milk.”? To add insult to injury, Danny Boyle won the best director award for his “work” on “Slumdog” even though there have been widespread and entirely credible allegations that he basically didn’t even direct the movie.

Need any further proof?? In 2005 “Crash” won out over “Brokeback Mountain.”? In 2000, “Gladiator” beat “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon.” In 1996, “The English Patient” got the nod over “Fargo.” In 1994, “Forrest Gump” was the choice over “Pulp Fiction.” In 1990, “Dances With Wolves” got the nod over “Goodfellas” (and am I the only one who was less than surprised that when Scorsese finally did wing Hollywood’s highest honor, it was for “The Departed,” which could very well be his worst movie?).? In 1980, “Ordinary People” received the blessing of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences over “Raging Bull.”

Seriously, though, the list is endless. Almost every year at least two or three of the five films nominated for Best Picture are actively bad, and it’s rare that the Best Picture recipient truly is just that.

So what, has the Academy in its infinite wisdom decided to do today? Go back to the days—the waaaaaayyyyy old days—of nominating ten films rather than five for Best Picture.

What, I ask, is the point? Will there be ten good films made this year? Of course.We don’t need the Hollywood establishment to confirm this fact. There are at least ten good movies made every year. But will those films be nominated? A few, undoubtedly—but as is the case in most years, most— if not all— of the year’s best films will be completely ignored by the Academy. We’ll just have eight crummy nominees and two good ones rather than three crummy nominees and two good ones. Again—what on Earth is the point?? Do we really need the awards show to be another 30 minutes longer? Do the geniuses that run the Academy really think it’s an “honor” for five more films to receive admittance into their exclusive little annual club of officially-blessed works?

In short, then—ten nominees instead of five. Are we really supposed to think that this somehow improves the chances that the best film of any given year will be recognized as such ?

Please.

mardi 28 mai 2013

Tomb Raider Erste Details zum Mehrspielermodus

Lara Croft selbst ist im Mehrspielermodus von Tomb Raider offenbar nicht mit von der Partie.

Gesellschaft fr Lara: Verleger Square Enix verpasst der Tomb Raider-Serie erstmals einen Mehrspielermodus. Was der zu bieten hat, entnahmen Nutzer eines Internetforums einem britischen Fachmagazin. Demnach zocken Sie in mindestens zwei verschiedenen Modi gegeneinander, wobei Sie wahlweise in die Rolle der Schiffbrchigen oder der Einheimischen schlpfen. Im Klassiker Team-Deathmatch gehen Sie der gegnerischen Gruppe in drei Runden an die Gurgel und nutzen die Vorzge von Fallen und einer zerstrbaren Umgebung. Die fllt den Informationen nach jedoch nicht allzu weitlufig aus.

Aderlass
Alternativ messen Sie sich im Spielmodus Rescue. Darin befrdern berlebende Gesundheitspakete zu vorgegebenen Abgabepunkten, whrend die Einheimischen versuchen, eine bestimmte Zahl an Spielern zu eliminieren. Allerdings sterben die Gegner nicht beim ersten Treffer sie bluten langsam aus. Dem Bericht zufolge krzen Sie diesen Prozess durch eine gezielte Nahkampf-Attacke ab. Unklar ist, ob Sie getroffene Team-Mitglieder auch heilen knnen.

Bildergalerie: Tomb Raider20 Bilder
Bild vergrern

Makaberer Einstieg: Tomb Raider stellt sofort klar, dass im Spiel ein gnadenloser berlebenskampf tobt.

Sturm beim Klettern an der Steilwand kommt gar nicht gut. Auf der Insel herrschen extreme Witterungsverhltnisse.

In dnner Bergluft entdeckt Lara ein altes Kloster, in dem offenbar kein Weiterkommen mglich ist. Jetzt sind Beobachtungsvermgen und Kombinationsgabe gefragt: Die gewaltige Glocke hngt an einem morschen Deckenbalken. Die davor aufgehngte Metallkugel ist mit einem weien Seil umwickelt: Das kennzeichnet sie als mgliches Ziel fr den Seilpfeil. Der Rest ist Formsache.

Lara bewegt sich frei auf der Insel und nutzt zahlreiche Abkrzungen.

Immer wieder kommt es zu Schieereien, in denen Lara die Deckung geschickt nutzen muss.

Nur stumpf draufzuhalten, hilft bei den Schildtrgern nicht.

Auf einer geheimnisvollen Insel gestrandet: Lara wrmt sich im ersten Basiscamp am Lagerfeuer auf.

Im Dauerregen hilft Lara mit sprlichsten Mitteln anderen Crewmitgliedern.

Bewaffnet mit Fackel und Bogen, sucht Lara nach verwertbaren Gegenstnden.

Bei der Erkundung der Insel trifft sie immer wieder auf hilfsbedrftige Crewmitglieder.

Auch im neuen Teil der Tomb Raider-Saga ist das Manvrieren von Lara oftmals ein Balanceakt.

Geht es nicht weiter, hilft in der Regel ein beherzter Sprung ber den Abgrund. Die Hauptfigur wirkt dabei stets elegant und gelenkig.

Ein Wolf berrascht Lara: Mensch und Tier winden sich in einem nervenzerfetzenden Duell.

Imagewechsel: Im neuen Tomb Raider ist Lara Croft keine unverwundbare Amazone mehr.

Entwickler Crystal Dynamics erzhlt die Geschichte einer verletzlichen und unerfahrenen jungen Frau zumindest zu Beginn des Abenteuers.

Als berlebende eines Schiffsunglcks strandet die frisch gebackene Uni-Absolventin auf einer mysterisen Insel.

Ihre primren Ziele sind das berleben und die Flucht von der Insel.

Beides versuchen die angriffslustigen Inselbewohner zu verhindern, denen bereits ein paar Mitreisende zum Opfer fielen.

Die Insel ist eine offene Welt, die Sie mit Lara frei erkunden. Je mehr Fhigkeiten die Archologin erlernt, desto entlegenere Gebiete des Eilands erkundet sie.

Beim Design der neuen Lara setzen die Entwickler nicht auf bertriebene weibliche Reize, sondern stellen ihr Gesicht speziell die durchdringenden Augen in den Vordergrund.

Makaberer Einstieg: Tomb Raider stellt sofort klar, dass im Spiel ein gnadenloser berlebenskampf tobt.

Sturm beim Klettern an der Steilwand kommt gar nicht gut. Auf der Insel herrschen extreme Witterungsverhltnisse.

In dnner Bergluft entdeckt Lara ein altes Kloster, in dem offenbar kein Weiterkommen mglich ist. Jetzt sind Beobachtungsvermgen und Kombinationsgabe gefragt: Die gewaltige Glocke hngt an einem morschen Deckenbalken. Die davor aufgehngte Metallkugel ist mit einem weien Seil umwickelt: Das kennzeichnet sie als mgliches Ziel fr den Seilpfeil. Der Rest ist Formsache.

Lara bewegt sich frei auf der Insel und nutzt zahlreiche Abkrzungen.

Immer wieder kommt es zu Schieereien, in denen Lara die Deckung geschickt nutzen muss.

Nur stumpf draufzuhalten, hilft bei den Schildtrgern nicht.

Auf einer geheimnisvollen Insel gestrandet: Lara wrmt sich im ersten Basiscamp am Lagerfeuer auf.

Im Dauerregen hilft Lara mit sprlichsten Mitteln anderen Crewmitgliedern.

Bewaffnet mit Fackel und Bogen, sucht Lara nach verwertbaren Gegenstnden.

Bei der Erkundung der Insel trifft sie immer wieder auf hilfsbedrftige Crewmitglieder.

Auch im neuen Teil der Tomb Raider-Saga ist das Manvrieren von Lara oftmals ein Balanceakt.

Geht es nicht weiter, hilft in der Regel ein beherzter Sprung ber den Abgrund. Die Hauptfigur wirkt dabei stets elegant und gelenkig.

Ein Wolf berrascht Lara: Mensch und Tier winden sich in einem nervenzerfetzenden Duell.

Imagewechsel: Im neuen Tomb Raider ist Lara Croft keine unverwundbare Amazone mehr.

Entwickler Crystal Dynamics erzhlt die Geschichte einer verletzlichen und unerfahrenen jungen Frau zumindest zu Beginn des Abenteuers.

Als berlebende eines Schiffsunglcks strandet die frisch gebackene Uni-Absolventin auf einer mysterisen Insel.

Ihre primren Ziele sind das berleben und die Flucht von der Insel.

Beides versuchen die angriffslustigen Inselbewohner zu verhindern, denen bereits ein paar Mitreisende zum Opfer fielen.

Die Insel ist eine offene Welt, die Sie mit Lara frei erkunden. Je mehr Fhigkeiten die Archologin erlernt, desto entlegenere Gebiete des Eilands erkundet sie.

Beim Design der neuen Lara setzen die Entwickler nicht auf bertriebene weibliche Reize, sondern stellen ihr Gesicht speziell die durchdringenden Augen in den Vordergrund.

zurckBild 1 von 20weiterMehrspielermodus ohne Lara Croft?
Offen bleibt vorerst auch, ob es noch weitere Spielmodi gibt. So machte Square-Enix-Mitarbeiter Karl Stewart offenbar Andeutungen ber einen weiteren mglichen Modus namens Cry For Help. In dem soll es vor allem um das Entdecken und Sammeln von Gegenstnden gehen. Dmpfer fr Lara-Fans: Laut Bericht gibt es zwar eine groe Auswahl an unterschiedlichen Charakteren fr den Multiplayermodus, die hbsche Heldin des Spiels ist aber anscheinend nicht dabei. Dafr individualisieren Sie Ihre Figuren mit steigenden Erfahrungspunkten und schalten zustzliche Gegenstnde frei.

Erscheinungstermin Tomb Raider: 5. Mrz 2013 fr PC, Playstation 3 und Xbox 360.

lundi 20 mai 2013

cinehoax “paul mccartney really is dead”

So, here we’re kicking off what looks to be a two-part sidebar (I’ll get around to the next film going under this banner sometime in the next week or two) your hose has decided to call “CineHoax” for reasons that should be pretty damn obvious pretty damn quickly. We’ll start at the supposed beginning and go from there —

In the summer of 2005, the Hollywood offices of fourth-rate rock n’ roll documentary producers Highway 61 Entertainment purportedly received a package in the mail from London with no return address (which raises the question how did they know it was, specifically, from London, and not just the UK?) that purportedly contained two microcassettes purportedly dated December 30, 1999 that (again, purportedly) contained the voice of George Harrison relating an amazing story — the Paul McCartney “death hoax” stuff that’s been floating around over the years is all true! The “real” McCartney apparently died in a car crash in 1966 after storming out of the recording studio following a heated argument with John Lennon and was replaced with a double (apparently some clown who won a Paul McCartney look-alike contest) at the behest of British intelligence in order to prevent what they felt was the mass suicide of hysterical Beatles fans (particularly of the teenage female variety) that would inevitable follow should news of this tragic accident reach the public.

For the rest of their career, both together and apart, the Fab Four were closely monitored by MI-5 to prevent them from spilling the beans on this, the original great rock n’ roll swindle — being the clever lads they were, however, the Beatles managed to sneak a few clues about the “truth” of the situation into various recordings through the miracle of backward-masking audio, and the result has been a slow but steady buzz that’s continued for over four decades.

Highway 61 president (and director of this “documentary”) Joel Gilbert apparently felt that, even though the material contained on these tapes could, of course, never be verified, the “information” contained on them is so explosive and revelatory that he just couldn’t sit on it forever — rather, being the massive humanitarian that he is, Gilbert had to get this information out somehow, no matter the risk to his own health and safety, and the result is the 2010 straight-to-DVD release Paul McCartney Really Is Dead : The Last Testament Of George Harrison?, a “film” which, in all honesty, is nothing more than a 95-minute voice-over of the “Harrison” recordings playing over a series of graphics, still photos, and backward-masking audio loops (obviously getting clearance to include any actual Beatles music was going to be waaaaaaayyyy far out of the question here). So, how convincing a case does this “blockbuster expose” present?

Well, let me be far from the first to call bullshit on some pretty obvious stuff here : to start with, the voice that the producers claim sounds “eerily like” Harrison sounds a lot more like an out-of-work American actor trying desperately to maintain a working-class Liverpudlian accent that Harrison no doubt — uhmmmmm — grew out of (or ditched, depending on how cynical about all things celebrity you might be) as time wore on. I’ve checked out a few YouTube clips of Harrison for the sake of comparison, and they pretty much sound nothing alike. Next up, there’s the “mysterious” origins of the tapes — my best guess, and mind you it’s only a guess, is that the original source of these “too hot to handle” recordings is Highway 61 Productions themselves. Now, they probably did, in fact, go to the trouble, after recording them, of then sending them to an associate in the UK who would then mail them back, unaddressed, in order to have a semi-plausible cover story, but this whole production strikes me as a thoroughly in-house affair from start to finish. And finally, we’ve got the plausibility of the whole story itself — sorry, but it’s just too soap opera to be all that believable. Paul and John have a fight — Paul storms off in his car — he’s not paying attention, and the weather bad — blam!, it’s all over, and the cover-up begins —

All of which is not to say, however, that I don’t think the “real” Paul might indeed be dead. Frankly, I have an open mind on the subject. But not because of anything presented in this flick. on the contrary, this production strikes me as the classic intelligence agency “double-bluff,” which basically works thusly —

Let’s say you’re a government agency or mega-corporate enterprise (what’s the difference, anyway?) and you’ve got some secret. It’s leaked out a bit, on whatever rudimentary level, and could cause you some headaches if it gains anything like real traction in the press. The best way to discredit it, as anybody involved in research fields as various and sundry as the Kennedy assassination of UFOs will tell you, is to “put it out there,” as it were, albeit in a form that strains credulity so far beyond the breaking point that it will thoroughly negate the story and consequently portray anybody involved in continuing to research it as a loon. So, if you’re British MI-5 and you want to discredit all “Paul is dead” theories and the folks pursuing them, the best way to do it is to put out your own film that says “hey, yes, Paul really might be dead” but do such a half-assed job of it that it makes any further investigation into the topic look like a waste of time. Throw in a few half-truths to make the premise itself or the research springing from it meet the unspoken standard that causes the average viewer to say to him-or herself “well, I guess I can see why they looked into this, but c’mon, people, this is just grasping at straws” as they watch with increasingly detached bemusement, and you’re all set. Mission fucking accomplished.

So, oddly (or perhaps not so oddly) enough, Paul McCartney Really Is Dead does provide some roundabout evidence to support its central claim(in fact, the existence of the film itself is this evidence) — not by advancing anything like a realistic and convincing examination of the rumors surrounding McCartney’s possible demise, but by doing such a shitty, third-rate, amateurish job of it that a questioning person has honestly gotta wonder if maybe there’s something to all this because the powers-that-be are so obviously still trying to discredit this whole line of investigation by dropping crap like this in the public’s lap. maybe Highway 61 Entertainment is being used deliberately, or maybe they just found a conveniently desperate huckster to peddle their wares through, but one way or another, by making “Paul is dead” research look like a fringe topic of concern to no one but sad obsessives, Joel Gilbert and company are playing right into the hands of the folks who would want to keep McCartney’s death a secret if it really did happen.

As to whether or not I personally think that Paul McCartney died in 1966 and was replaced by a double. I’ll just say this —

Given that McCartney’s post-Beatles career is made up of simple-minded drivel like “Silly Love Songs” and the truly, almost incomparably loathsome pro-”war on terrorism” anthem “Freedom” (which undoubtedly had both George Harrison and John Lennon spinning in their graves), does it really matter?

lundi 6 mai 2013

Arctic Cooling Launches Universal Chargers


Arctic C1 and C2

Swiss based Arctic Cooling has unveiled the Arctic C1 and C2 universal chargers,expanding its product portfolio. Measuring 53 x 53 x 25mm and 75 x 50 x29mm, the lightweight universal chargers have 1x and 4x USB ports forcharging respectively, and incorporate Short Circuit Protection, OverCurrent Protection and Over Power Protection for safety and peace ofmind.


Arctic C1


Arctic C2


Arctic C1 with Accessories


Arctic C2 with Accessories

Backed by a 2 year warranty, the chargers comes bundled with 4xinterchangeable plugs for compatibility with over 150 countries andretail at a MSRP of USD$21.95/ 14.95 Euro (C1) and $26.55 / 17.95 Euro(C2) via Arctic’s online store. A definite recommendation for frequenttravelers with many USB-powered devices such as mp3 players, PSPs,mobile phones etc.

News via [ArcticCooling]